| |

The religious term you should try to stop using (Editor’s note: “cult”)

In this March 22, 1993 file photo, a spotlight shines over the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas. The Branch Davidians were often described as a cult by journalists and law enforcement officials.
In this March 22, 1993 file photo, a spotlight shines over the Branch Davidian compound near Waco, Texas. The Branch Davidians were often described as a cult by journalists and officials. | Rick Bowmer,
This article was first published in the State of Faith newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Monday night.

Unlike “faith group” or “church” or “Bible study,” the term “cult” evokes a powerful emotional reaction.

When you hear it, your ears perk up as you await juicy details, just like they would if your friends told you they had an exciting piece of gossip to share. To hear a religious group described as a cult is to feel immediately certain that something nefarious is going on. It calls to mind sex scandals or or physical violence — in many cases, all three. The common association between cult and various forms of trauma is a major reason why some religion scholars and journalists, among others, are leading a charge to banish the term from public life. The Associated Press' latest update to the religion section of its style guide suggests avoiding the label, as does a new religion reporting guide from ReligionLink. ReligionLink notes that describing a group as a “cult” dehumanizes the people involved and increases the likelihood that they'll face violence from government officials and others seeking to determine what's really going on in the organization. “Virtually no one who is part of a group labeled as a ‘cult' sees themself as a cult member. Rather they are a believer, disciple, or part of a religious community,” ReligionLink reports. The guide also says, “Once the label is applied … it is virtually impossible to shake the association, and it can have extraordinary life or death consequences.” To be clear, those who discourage use of the term “cult” still think it's important to report on abusive or otherwise dangerous faith leaders and groups. But they recommend doing so by including thorough, nuanced descriptions of what's happening behind the scenes, rather than labels like “cult” that encourage readers to jump to conclusions. As journalist Bobby Ross Jr. pointed out last year, efforts to expel the term “cult” from the world of journalism have seen mixed success so far. Many journalists have stopped emphasizing the label, but they often still use it to back-up other descriptions by, for example, writing that some people would consider a group to be a cult. In that way, the debate over using the term “cult” reminds me of the ongoing debate over using the term “Mormon.” After leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints announced in 2018 that they'd prefer journalists to avoid the labels “LDS” or “Mormons,” many journalists began including the full name of the church in stories. However, they often still use phrases like “Latter-day Saints are commonly known as Mormons.”